The new way of testing a stove's heat output and efficiency does not allow comparison of different stoves because the test conditions are not comparable. You can read more about this on the two pages listed below - this page will show a few examples of how the new tests are confusing and largely useless.
For more information about the stove heat output test see our stove heat output page.
For more information about the stove efficiency test see our stove efficiency page.
For example 1 and 2 we have chosen some Morso stove test results. Morso make some of the very best stoves available today and we would unreservedly recommend them to you. The fact that we have chosen some Morso stoves to show how the new test method can lead to confusing results is in no way meant to reflect badly on Morso stoves: Morso still make very high quality stoves - it is not the stove that has changed it is the testing method. It is the new way of testing stoves that is confusing not any particular manufacturer.
The Morso Squirrel stove comes in 2 models: the older 'Standard Squirrel' and the more modern 'Cleanheat Squirrel'. As it's name suggests the Cleanheat is a cleanburning stove that uses preheated secondary air to allow for fuller combustion. Let's look at the efficiency and heat outputs of the two models:
| Efficiency | Nominal heat output | Previous heat output given | |
| Standard Squirrel | 76% | 4.5 kW | 4.0 kW |
| Cleanheat Squirrel | 71% | 4.6 kW | 6 kW |
So if I relied on the new figures I would think that the Standard Squirrel is more efficient, gives out nearly the same heat, and is cheaper so why would I buy the Cleanheat version?
However from experience I can say that the Cleanheat will give out more heat than the Standard (it used to have a maximum heat output rating of 6kW!) has about the same size of firebox and should use less wood to create the same heat. Someone buying the Cleanheat who actually wanted 4.6kW output stove will also end up with a stove that gives out more heat than they wanted.
The Morso Panther is a nice medium sized stove whilst the 3610 stove is much bigger - it is about 200mm higher, 150mm wider, 100mm deeper. Let's look at the efficiency and heat outputs of these two models:
| Efficiency | Nominal heat output | Previous heat output given | |
| Morso Panther | 72% | 9 kW | 8.0 kW |
| Morso 3610 | 73% | 9.8 kW | 16 kW |
Going by these figures there is not much to choose from between these two models other than looks. However a collegue has a Morso Panther in a medium sized room (about 5m x 5m x 2.3m - an old cottage with uninsulated walls) and this is the perfect size of stove for the room. Now I know if we installed the 3610 in the same room and tried to use it properly it would be like a sauna in there! The 3610 used to be rated at 16kW - much higher than the output of the Panther (of course the 3610 could happily run slowly so that would not necessarily be a problem but I'm sure you can see the point).
Because there is not a level playing field when it comes to test conditions a stove customer cannot usefully compare the heat ouputs of stoves nor their efficiencies. You can't really be expected to factor in things like how open the air vents were during the test or how often the stove was refuelled and with what size of fuel - the point of the test results is to give an idea of how a stove will perform and to enable comparison between stove types. A test conducted at maximum output would give results that could at least be compared.
Our advice? For the moment ask us or speak to other experienced stove experts, the figures are a farce.